Sunday, May 26, 2019

History book report Essay

It is the circumstances and the characters of the founding brothers, their ideological as well as personal conflicts that created the US as a nation. SUMMARY Here is a presentation of US Historythe creation of a new nation that does not attempt to consolidate events into a general account that suggests the inevitability of the resolving power of Independence but examines biography in light of a handful of episodes involving central personages, their passions and conflicts that reveal as much of the creation of the nation after the Constitutional Convention.At one end were the Federalists including Washington, Hamilton and Adams who believed that revolution was a necessary step in order to establish US nationhood as embodied by the newly established federal government. On the other were the Republicans including Jefferson and Madison who saw revolution in its liberating character, holding the Declaration of Independence as most sacred, in contrast to the Federalists who consider th e Constitution most dear. At that time, there was no notion of valid opposition. Both sides purview about the others position as treasonable.These are the circumstances that surround the duel between Hamilton and Barr, which led to the formers death and appeal the latters political career. These are the circumstances that led to Washingtons non-acceptance of a third term as well as Jeffersons treacherous vilification of his friend, John Adams. This high level of political tension led to the compromise in 1790 to appease the Southern states, as a go away of fear of the states secession (despite both parties belief that slavery was inconsistent with the principles embodied by the Revolution).In all stages of these events, the characters were aware of that they were in fact, making history. BOOK REVIEWS 1. In Bobricks (2000) review of the Founding Brothers, he compared the Ellis style to Lytton Strachey, the author of Eminent Victorians. But according to him, Ellis was different in a way that the latter never veered towards making a caricature of the characters. He described the book as splendid humane, learned, written with flair and radiant with a calm intelligence and wit. He also guaranteed that even those who are familiar with the revolutionary generation will find the book to be both captivating and enlightening of the first old age of America as a nation. 2. Meanwhile, Hodgson (2002) said that Ellis method made possible the retention by general readers of their interest in a highly-intelligent discussion of eighteenth century politics. He thinks that The Founding Brothers is one of those rare books/analyses that can be read for pleasure. But despite these comments, he also notes that Ellis work suffers the characteristics of American Exceptionalism and helplessness to acknowledge Britains version of history.The Independent, where Hodgsons review was published is a British newspaper. REACTION TO BOOK REVIEWS There is nothing surprising about the posit ivist reviews gained by The Founding Brothers. After all, with the pervasiveness of the linear or historiographic approach, there is no doubt that the books manner of presentation can be characterized as a breath of fresh air. Ellis novel approach enabled him to indirectly give a general and probably in many ways, different accounts of history by being able to pick only six of all specific stories that could have contributed to history.This indicates not only deep knowledge of the personal lives of slightly characters as some reviewers point out, but also indicates a deep insight of what transpired in history as well as what as its implications and consequences. While it is certain that Ellis was able to make the book more interesting to the general readers, it is arguable that the books indifferent to others version of history is an issue. Ellis does not claim to make for to be a version of other nations histories or any nations history for that weigh.At best, what Ellis book a ttempts to represent is his own interpretation of history considering everything that he studied, and analyzed both as writer, researcher and historian. ENLIGHTENING Interpretations of history can be different depending on the manner of its presentation. In schools, and even in colleges, these founders are usually picture as saints, sometimes even to the point of idolatry. Ellis presentation of these founders is an attempt to humanize them in the minds of the readers.In the end, they are not depicted purely as models of idealism, motivated by pure goodwill and love for the country, but as politicians who regardless of their real motives are affected by contradictory circumstances, and sometimes real ambition. ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT The book is already enjoyable as it is despite whatever flaws it may have. One reviewer notes the fact that some point of views, particularly those of the British were not taken into account. The writer personally do not think that such alteration, or any alteration for that matter would be necessary to cause a significant change on the effect that the book had to the readers.References Bobrick, B. (2000). The Brethren. New York Times Online. Retrieved 28 April 2009 from http//www. nytimes. com/books/00/12/10/reviews/001210. 10bobrict. hypertext markup language? scp=1&sq=founding%20brothers%20review%20ellis&st=cse. Ellis, J. (2001). Founding Brothers The Revolutionary Generation. Alfred Knopf New York. Hodgson, G. (2002). The Apostles of the US Brought to Life. The Independent Online. Retrieved 28 Apriil 2009 from http//www. independent. co. uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/founding-brothersthe-revolutionary-generation-by-joseph-j-ellis-750973. html.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.